AI rules for self-represented litigants: U.S. District Court, Middle District of Georgia
In effect · Federal · Georgia
| Scope | Pro se parties in the federal district court for the Middle District of Georgia |
|---|---|
| Order or rule | Use of Artificial Intelligence (guidance for pro se litigants) |
| Status | In effect |
| Applies to self-represented litigants | Yes. Written for pro se parties. |
| Do you have to disclose AI use? | No. The guidance does not require disclosure. |
| Certification required | No separate AI certification. Signing a filing already certifies it under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11. |
| What you must verify | Make sure all facts and legal authorities in your filings are accurate. |
| Sanctions mentioned | Rule 11 sanctions, which could include dismissal of your lawsuit. |
Summary
The Middle District of Georgia urges pro se parties to be cautious with AI tools such as ChatGPT. Using AI does not reduce your responsibility for accurate facts and law, and errors can lead to Rule 11 sanctions.
What this means for you
- There is no AI disclosure form, but you are fully responsible for what AI wrote.
- Check every fact and every legal citation before you sign.
- Errors can lead to sanctions, including dismissal.
Use of AI by Pro Se Litigants, Middle District of Georgia
Last verified: 2026-10-21
Changes
- 2026-10-21 — Added to directory.
This summary is general legal information, not legal advice. Court rules change, and individual judges may add their own requirements. Always read the official order and your judge's rules before you file.
Preparing for a hearing?
Practice your testimony in the VoxJurisPath courtroom simulator.